Here’s an article based on your requests:
Optimizing the scanning history of salt transactions with an architecture with multiple mahin
As a programmer who builds a service that listens and resolves the transactions of Solan, I have come across a challenge with my multi-mahine architecture. According to the default settings, both cases would process the minutes isolated, which could lead to inconsistencies in collecting data and potentially result in missed transactions.
Problem: The lack of consistency of data
If one instance is extinguished, they will continue to receive new records of transactions, but the other instance will not have access to them. This can cause problems if we rely on the same group transactions for processing or validation.
To solve this problem, I addressed Solan’s built -in record mechanism and implemented a simple solution for scanning the history of transactions block:
History of scanning transactions by block
Here’s a review of my approach:
- Set the record : Configure both instances with the same record for recording the minutes.
- Make a transaction scanning function
: Write a separate function that listens to salt transactions and uploads our database or data structure in memory accordingly.
Things become interesting here – now we can scan the history of transactions by block without any conflict:
`Javascript
Const transaction = {}; // Initialize an empty storage facility all transactions
Const logger = …; // Set an instance of the record
Async function logtransation (transaction) {
try {
Const transactionhash = transaction.hash;
IF (! transactions [transaction]) {) {
Transactions [transactionakhash] = {};
Iche
for (Const key in transaction [transaction]) {
Transactions [transactionhash] [key] .push (transaction);
Iche
} capture (error) {
logger.error (‘error processing transaction:’, error);
Iche
Iche
Async function scantransationhistorybyblock (block) {{
Const Block = wait for Getblockinfo (blocknumber);
Const TransactionAinthisblock = [];
for (Const intake Blonfo.transactions) {) {
if (entry.type === ‘transaction’) {)
logtransation (entry);
Iche
// Add all other relevant data from the transaction to our database
Iche
Iche
`
Example uses the case
Here's an example of how we can use this function to scan the history of transactions using a certain block number:
Javascript
Const blockchain = …; // Suppose we have access to blockchain instance
Async function main () {{
Const blocknumber = 12345;
await scantrartationhistorybyblock (blocknumber);
Iche
``
This approach ensures that our service remains consistent even when one instance is extinguished, providing a reliable way to process and confirm the transactions on Solana.